Suchergebnisse

Bu çalışma Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi'nin değişen laiklik politikasını 18 Nisan 1999 ve 31 Mart 2019 yerel yönetim seçimlerinde İstanbul örneği üzerinden liderlerin söylem ve vaatlerini dikkate alınarak ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada özellikle laiklik kavramı din eksenli incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda laiklik, devlet ve toplum bağlamında analiz edilerek CHP'nin din ile ilişkisi, ideolojik eğilimleri dikkate alınmış olup dönemsel olarak analiz edilmiştir. 18 Nisan 1999 seçimlerinde geliştirilen laiklik söylemi için daha çok o dönemde partinin söylem ve siyasal reklamlarını öne çıkartan gazeteler arasında olan Cumhuriyet, Hürriyet, Milliyet ve Radikal gazeteleri dikkate alınırken; 31 Mart 2019 seçimleri için ise daha çok haber ve internet kaynakların taranmasıyla elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonunda 1999 yılında dönemin içinde bulunduğu toplumsal, siyasal ve ekonomik koşulların da dikkate alınması neticesinde 2019 yılı seçimleriyle mukayese edildiğinde daha radikal bir laiklik anlayışıyla seçim hazırlıkları yapıldığı görülmüştür. Fransız laisizminden beslenen 1990'lı yılların CHP'si daha radikal düzeyde söylem ve politikalarını geliştirirken daha çok din ile mesafeli tutumu ve farklı yaşam tarzlarını dışlayan bir yaklaşım benimsemiştir. 2010'lardan sonraki süreçte ise Anglo-Sakson sekülerizmini benimseyen CHP bu defa ılımlı bir laiklik yaklaşımını benimsemiştir. Farklılıkları zenginliğe açılan bir anahtar olarak ele alan bu yaklaşımla parti daha liberal bir anlayış benimseyerek birey yaşamının hem kamusal hem bireysel alanını kapsayan saygı prensibini merkezine almıştır. Ülkenin içinden geçtiği toplumsal ve siyasal dönüşümlerde değişimin karşısında durmayan CHP, bu dönüşümle beraber bir anlamda pragmatik anlayış benimsemiş ve birbirinden farklı bu iki süreçte radikal bir kopuş örneğini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Belediye başkan adaylarının profillerinden, seçim sloganı ve seçim gezileri için temaslarda bulunulan alanlarda değinilen ana temalara ve seçmen kitlelerine değin hemen hemen her konuda bambaşka iki CHP'nin ortaya çıkması, laiklik politikasında mütedeyyin kesimleri de kapsamak isteyen mutedil bir anlayışa meyil ettiği anlaşılmıştır. ; This study aimed to reveal the changing secularism policy of the Republican People's Party in the local government elections of 18 April 1999 and 31 March 2019, taking into account the discourses and promises of the leaders, through the example of Istanbul. In the study, especially the concept of laicism has been examined in terms of religion. In this context, the concept of laicism was analyzed in the context of the state and society, and the CHP's relationship between religion and ideological tendencies were taken into account and analyzed periodically. While considering the secularism discourse developed in the 18 April 1999 elections, Cumhuriyet, Hürriyet, Milliyet and Radikal, which were among the newspapers that highlighted the party's discourse and political advertisements at that time; for the 31 March 2019 elections, it was obtained by scanning mostly news and internet sources. At the end of the research, when the social, political and economic conditions of the period were taken into account in 1999, when compared to the 2019 elections, it was seen that the election preparations were made with a more radical understanding of secularism. While the CHP of the 1990s, fed by French laicism, developed its discourse and policies at a more radical level, it adopted an approach that mostly excluded religion and different lifestyles. In the period after the 2010s, the CHP, which adopted Anglo-Saxon secularism, adopted a moderate secularism approach this time. With this approach, which considers differences as a key to wealth, the party has adopted a more liberal understanding and has centered on the principle of respect, which covers both the public and individual spheres of individual life. The CHP, which did not stand against change in the social and political transformations the country went through, adopted a pragmatic understanding in a sense with this transformation and revealed an example of a radical break in these two different processes. It has been understood that the emergence of two completely different CHPs in almost every subject, from the profiles of the mayoral candidates to the main themes mentioned in the areas where contacts are made for the election slogan and election tours, and the electorate, tends to a moderate understanding that wants to include the religious segments in the secularism policy.

12th International Conference on Urban Regeneration and Sustainability (Sustainable City) --2017 -- Seville, SPAIN ; WOS: 000451538100031 ; The aim of this study is to scrutinize cultural management in terms of control, regulations and sociocultural dynamics in the projects of urban transformation/gentrification including the historical and cultural areas in Istanbul. To analyze the cultural politics of urban transformation, along with the socio-spatial impacts of the process of gentrification, Suleymaniye and Fener-Balat have been chosen as two districts that were included in the World Heritage List due to the historical-cultural patterns they display. Evidently, the social ethos, created through Neo-Ottomanist approaches in urban renewal processes, is unregulated. Thus, it is necessary to examine the apparatuses of power in the matter of sustaining the representations of historical and cultural identity, which make up collective memory in terms of identity and space construction. It is assumed that the dynamics of urban transformation have also been transforming collective consciousness based on historicity. In this context, concepts such as urban alienation, mental unmappability, the emptying of minds and cultural uprooting, have enriched the theoretical construction of the study in analyzing the management of collective memory that is intricately tied to the process of global urbanization. With the institutionalization of centralized politics, we are witnessing the instrumentalization of urban space and the placement of urban transformation on a strictly market-based trajectory with no room for an alternative path. Moreover, the relationship between symbolic capital and collective memory as the basis of cultural heritage seems to have been ruptured. Ultimately, what is at risk is the ideal of a human-centered, democratic community, encompassing contrapuntal ensembles (different narratives based on historicity that could only be interpreted via each other and make sense related with each other in their own cultural representations/specifications) and polyphonic cultural constituents. Along with the paradigm of neoliberal urbanization came the new phenomenon of urban space design, mediatization of culture and collective memory. Expressed in the language of consumption, designed to fit packaged socio-spatial practices and emotions, it is argued that we now entered a post-emotional socialization stage. ; Wessex Inst, Univ Seville, Int Journal Sustainable Dev & Planning, WIT Transact Ecol & Environm

12th International Conference on Urban Regeneration and Sustainability (Sustainable City) -- 2017 -- Seville, SPAIN ; The aim of this study is to scrutinize cultural management in terms of control, regulations and sociocultural dynamics in the projects of urban transformation/gentrification including the historical and cultural areas in Istanbul. To analyze the cultural politics of urban transformation, along with the socio-spatial impacts of the process of gentrification, Suleymaniye and Fener-Balat have been chosen as two districts that were included in the World Heritage List due to the historical-cultural patterns they display. Evidently, the social ethos, created through Neo-Ottomanist approaches in urban renewal processes, is unregulated. Thus, it is necessary to examine the apparatuses of power in the matter of sustaining the representations of historical and cultural identity, which make up collective memory in terms of identity and space construction. It is assumed that the dynamics of urban transformation have also been transforming collective consciousness based on historicity. In this context, concepts such as urban alienation, mental unmappability, the emptying of minds and cultural uprooting, have enriched the theoretical construction of the study in analyzing the management of collective memory that is intricately tied to the process of global urbanization. With the institutionalization of centralized politics, we are witnessing the instrumentalization of urban space and the placement of urban transformation on a strictly market-based trajectory with no room for an alternative path. Moreover, the relationship between symbolic capital and collective memory as the basis of cultural heritage seems to have been ruptured. Ultimately, what is at risk is the ideal of a human-centered, democratic community, encompassing contrapuntal ensembles (different narratives based on historicity that could only be interpreted via each other and make sense related with each other in their own cultural ...